Petition for quashing of FIR

  1. Petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
    (‘Cr.P.C.’) has been preferred on behalf of the petitioners for quashing of
    FIR No. 338/2021, under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC registered at P.S.:
    Palam Village and proceedings emanating therefrom. Section 354 IPC is
    stated to have been subsequently invoked.
  2. Issue notice. Learned APP for the State and learned counsel for
    respondent No.2 alongwith respondent No.2 in person appear on advance
    notice and accept notice.
  3. In brief, as per the case of the petitioner, marriage between petitioner
    No. 1 and respondent No. 2 was solemnized according to Hindu rites and
    ceremonies on 02.05.2014. Due to temperamental differences, respondent
    CRL.M.C. 867/2024 Page 2 of 3
    No.2 and petitioner No.1 started living separately since 01.08.2020. Present
    FIR was registered on 12.08.2021, pursuant to complaint lodged by
    respondent No. 2.
  4. The matter is stated to have been amicably resolved between the
    parties, in terms of settlement dated 27.07.2023 arrived at Delhi Mediation
    Centre, Dwarka Courts, New Delhi. The marriage between petitioner No. 1
    and respondent No. 2 has been dissolved by decree of divorce by way of
    mutual consent under Section 13B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act vide
    judgment dated 21.10.2023.
  5. Balance amount of Rs. 3,00,000/- has been paid to respondent No. 2
    through Demand Draft No. 162386 dated 15.11.2023 drawn on Bank of
    Baroda, Mahavir Enclave, New Delhi Branch, in favour of respondent No. 2
    towards full and final settlement between the parties.
  6. Learned APP for the State submits that in view of amicable settlement
    between the parties, the State has no objection in case the FIR in question is
    quashed.
  7. Petitioner No. 1 as well as respondent No. 2 as well as petitioner
    Nos. 2 to 6 are present in person and have been identified by SI Jaiveer
    Kumar, PS: Palam Village. I have interacted with the parties and they
    confirm that the matter has been amicably settled between them without any
    threat, pressure or coercion. Respondent No. 2 also states that nothing
    remains to be further adjudicated upon between the parties and she has no
    objection in case the FIR in question is quashed.
  8. Considering the facts and circumstances, since the matter has been
    amicably settled between the parties, no useful purpose shall be served by
    keeping the case pending. It would be nothing but an abuse of the process of
    CRL.M.C. 867/2024 Page 3 of 3
    Court. Consequently, FIR No. 338/2021 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC
    and Section 354 IPC, registered at PS Palam Village and the proceedings
    emanating therefrom stand quashed.
    Petition is accordingly disposed of. A copy of this order be forwarded
    to the concerned Court for information.
    ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA, J.
    FEBRUARY 05, 2024/v
Rate this post
Open chat
Hello 👋
Can we help you?