One of my clients recently had a case which I am explaining below and if you are stuck in such similar situation, here is what to do.
Note: Due to attorney-client privilege, I cannot disclose complete case details or identify the actual parties involved. However, I am sharing the essential facts and legal approach so that if you find yourself in a similar situation, you can understand the available solutions and legal remedies.
Mr.X approached me in distress after Mr.Y filed a Section 138 case under the Negotiable Instruments Act, claiming Mr.X had taken a friendly cash loan of Rs. 9,20,000 and issued a cheque that bounced. However, the reality was different. Mr.X had indeed given Mr.Y a blank cheque earlier but it was completely unsigned. Mr.Y fraudulently filled in the amount and forged Mr.X’s signature on the cheque. There was no cash transaction or loan agreement between them. Mr.Y was exploiting the legal presumption under Section 138 that the cheque was issued for valid consideration. This case required careful handling to expose the forgery and establish that no legitimate debt existed.
Advice in Such Cases
Consult with Lawyer: The very basic and important step to start is talk to Lawyer / advocate. You should not hesitate in paying his consultation fee i.e. might be in range of Rs. 10,000 to 50,000 depends case to case. He is helping you in this situation to come out. He is expert in the domain and can help you explain the procedure which you might have never explored. A good lawyer can get the issues resolved much faster than you think.
- Immediately gather all evidence proving the signature is forged
- Document any communications that contradict the loan claim
- Obtain handwriting expert analysis to prove signature forgery
- Challenge the presumption of valid consideration under Section 139 of NI Act
Applicable Sections of Law
Under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), Section 336 deals with forgery and Section 340 covers using forged documents as genuine. The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) Section 195 provides procedures for filing counter-complaints. Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act creates liability for cheque dishonor, but Section 139 allows rebutting the presumption of consideration. The defense can invoke BNS Section 318 regarding false evidence and Section 351 for criminal breach of trust if applicable.
If You Are the Complainant
- File complaint under Section 138 within 30 days of notice period expiry
- Ensure proper service of legal notice demanding payment
- Maintain complete records of the loan transaction and cheque
- Present evidence of valid consideration and debt relationship
- Keep original cheque and supporting documents safe
If You Are the Victim
- Immediately file counter-complaint for forgery under BNS Section 336
- Arrange handwriting expert examination of the disputed signature
- Collect evidence proving no loan transaction occurred
- File complaint for using forged document under BNS Section 340
- Document timeline showing when you gave blank unsigned cheque
How the Police Behave in Such Cases
Police typically treat Section 138 cases as civil disputes initially. However, when forgery is alleged, they may register separate FIR under BNS provisions. They often advise compromise settlements. Police may be reluctant to investigate handwriting experts unless court-ordered. They require substantial evidence before proceeding with forgery charges. Investigation priority is usually lower unless supported by strong documentary evidence.
FAQs People Normally Have
Can I defend Section 138 case by proving forgery? Yes, proving signature forgery rebuts the presumption under Section 139 NI Act.
Is handwriting expert testimony conclusive? Expert opinion is strong evidence but courts evaluate it with other circumstances.
Can I file counter-case for forgery? Yes, you can file complaint under BNS Section 336 for forgery simultaneously.
What if I gave blank cheque voluntarily? You must prove no authorization for amount filling and signature.
What Evidence Is Required?
- Original specimen signatures for handwriting comparison
- Bank records showing no cash withdrawal matching claimed loan amount
- Communications between parties contradicting loan claim
- Witness testimony about circumstances of cheque issuance
- Expert handwriting analysis report
- CCTV or documentary evidence disproving loan transaction
- Financial records showing your inability to borrow such amount
How Long Will the Investigation Take?
Section 138 cases typically conclude within 6-12 months if uncontested. With forgery allegations, timeline extends to 12-24 months due to handwriting expert requirements and additional evidence collection. Counter-complaints for forgery may take 18-36 months. Court scheduling and expert availability significantly impact duration. Complex cases involving multiple charges may extend beyond 2 years.
Advocate Sudhir Rao, Supreme Court of India

