One of my clients recently had a case which I am explaining below and if you are stuck in such similar situation, here is what to do.
Note: Due to attorney-client privilege, I cannot disclose complete case details or identify the actual parties involved. However, I am sharing the essential facts and legal approach so that if you find yourself in a similar situation, you can understand the available solutions and legal remedies.
Kavita Reddy had been working in Singapore for nearly seven years. Back home in Nagpur, her younger sister Sunita had access to the family residence in Dharampeth and, over time, managed to open a locked cabinet where Kavita kept her personal financial documents. Sunita forged Kavita's signature on two cheques and withdrew ₹1,00,000 from her State Bank of India savings account. The bank processed the cheques without flagging any signature discrepancy.
Kavita discovered the fraud in early March 2025, when her chartered accountant in Nagpur flagged an unexplained debit while reconciling her accounts. She immediately approached the branch manager and submitted a written complaint. Weeks passed. Nothing moved. The branch acknowledged receipt of her complaint but offered no resolution, and no internal inquiry report was shared with her.
A colleague then referred Kavita to Advocate Sudhir Rao. What struck her was that a general civil lawyer she had briefly consulted earlier had suggested only a civil recovery suit — an approach that would have ignored the criminal dimensions entirely and left the bank's liability unaddressed. After reviewing the full facts, Advocate Sudhir Rao mapped out a combined strategy: a criminal complaint under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for forgery and cheating, a formal grievance against the bank for failure to exercise due diligence in signature verification, and a legal notice to Sunita demanding repayment. Within a few months, the police registered an FIR, the bank initiated an internal inquiry, and Sunita agreed to a settlement under legal pressure. Kavita recovered her money and the matter was resolved far sooner than she had expected.
Advice in Such Cases
Consult with Lawyer: The very basic and important step to start is talk to Lawyer / advocate. You should not hesitate in paying his consultation fee i.e. might be in range of Rs. 10,000 to 50,000 depends case to case. He is helping you in this situation to come out. He is expert in the domain and can help you explain the procedure which you might have never explored. A good lawyer can get the issues resolved much faster than you think.
File a Police Complaint Immediately: Don't rely only on the bank to resolve this. Forgery of a signature on a cheque is a cognizable criminal offence. File a complaint at the local police station with jurisdiction over the area where the bank branch is located. A written, timestamped complaint creates a formal record that protects you legally.
Send a Legal Notice to the Bank: The bank owes a duty of care to verify signatures before honouring cheques. And here's the thing — if the bank failed in that duty, a formal legal notice demanding a written explanation and compensation does two things at once: it signals you're serious, and it creates pressure for an internal inquiry that can produce useful documentary evidence.
Engage an Advocate with Domain Experience: Forgery-cum-bank-fraud matters sit at the intersection of criminal law, banking regulation, and civil recovery. Make no mistake, procedural steps, evidence preservation, and the sequence of filings matter enormously here. A general practitioner unfamiliar with these intersecting areas may miss critical angles that an advocate with specific experience in financial fraud and forgery cases will spot immediately.
Applicable Sections of Law
This is primarily a criminal matter with a civil recovery dimension. The following provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS) and Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) apply:
- Section 336 BNS — Forgery: making a false document or false electronic record with intent to cause damage or injury.
- Section 340 BNS — Forgery of a valuable security or will: specifically covers forging cheques and negotiable instruments, attracting higher punishment.
- Section 318 BNS — Cheating: dishonestly inducing the bank to deliver property (money) by forged means.
- Section 316(2) BNS — Criminal breach of trust: where the accused was in a position of trust or had lawful custody of the cheque book and misused it.
Punishment and Penalties
- Section 336 BNS (Forgery): Imprisonment up to two years, fine, or both.
- Section 340 BNS (Forgery of valuable security/cheque): Imprisonment up to seven years and fine — significantly higher given the instrument involved.
- Section 318 BNS (Cheating): Imprisonment up to three years, fine, or both.
- Cognizable: Yes — police can arrest without a warrant.
- Bailable: Section 336 BNS is bailable; Section 340 BNS and Section 318 BNS are non-bailable.
- Compoundable: Section 318 BNS (cheating) is compoundable with the court's permission; forgery offences are generally non-compoundable.
Jurisdiction — Where to File the Case
For the criminal complaint, jurisdiction lies with the police station in whose territorial limits the forged cheque was presented or the bank branch is situated. Since the cheque was encashed at a specific branch, that branch's locality determines which police station is appropriate. The trial, once chargesheet is filed, will be before the Judicial Magistrate First Class (JMFC) for offences under Section 336 and 318 BNS, and before a Sessions Court for offences under Section 340 BNS given the seven-year punishment threshold. Frankly, territorial and pecuniary jurisdiction must be correctly identified before filing — errors here cause avoidable delays that can stretch into months.
What if Police Refuse to File FIR?
Police sometimes hesitate when the dispute involves family members. Don't accept inaction as a final answer. Here's what you can do:
- Submit a written complaint to the Superintendent of Police (SP) of the district under Section 173(4) BNSS, requesting direction to register the FIR.
- File a private complaint directly before the Judicial Magistrate under Section 175(3) BNSS — the Magistrate can direct the police to investigate after examining the complaint.
- As a last resort, approach the High Court under its writ jurisdiction seeking a direction to the police to register and investigate the FIR — courts have consistently protected complainants in such cases (see: Lalita Kumari v. Government of UP, 2014, where the Supreme Court held that registration of FIR is mandatory for cognizable offences).
- Preserve every written communication with the police — acknowledgement slips, emails, and diary entries — as these become evidence of police inaction if you escalate.
Rights of the Accused
If your relative (the accused) is arrested, they're entitled to the following rights under Indian law:
- Right against self-incrimination under Article 20(3) of the Constitution — the accused cannot be compelled to be a witness against themselves.
- Right to legal representation under Article 22 of the Constitution — the accused may engage a lawyer of their choice immediately upon arrest.
- Right to be produced before a Magistrate within 24 hours of arrest, excluding travel time, under Article 22(2) and Section 57 BNSS.
- Right to a copy of the FIR and to be informed of the grounds of arrest.
- Right to a fair trial — no conviction without evidence proved beyond reasonable doubt.
Bail Provisions
Forgery of a cheque under Section 340 BNS is non-bailable. The accused must apply for bail before the competent court. Now, before you act, understand what options exist:
- Anticipatory bail under Section 482 BNSS — if the accused apprehends arrest, they can apply to the Sessions Court or High Court for pre-arrest bail protection.
- Regular bail under Section 480 / 483 BNSS — after arrest, the accused can apply before the Magistrate or Sessions Court depending on the offence.
- Typical bail conditions include surety, surrender of passport, and a direction not to contact the complainant or tamper with evidence.
- From the complainant's side, opposing bail by highlighting the risk of evidence tampering (the accused may have access to documents) is a valid and important strategic step your advocate should address specifically.
Quashing of FIR / Case
The accused may attempt to get the FIR quashed by the High Court under Section 528 BNSS, which preserves the court's inherent powers. Grounds typically argued include absence of prima facie offence, that the matter is civil in nature, or that a compromise has been reached. As the complainant, you should be aware of this possibility. Courts have held in State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal, 1992 that quashing is appropriate only in rare and exceptional cases. Forgery of a negotiable instrument (cheque) rarely qualifies as a case where a quashing petition will succeed, especially where the forged signature is supported by forensic handwriting evidence.
If You Are the Victim
- File a written complaint at the police station with jurisdiction over the bank branch — do this before the accused has time to destroy evidence or create a counter-narrative.
- Send a registered legal notice to the bank citing its failure to verify your signature, and demand a full statement of account and internal inquiry details in writing.
- Secure your remaining cheque books, bank accounts, and financial documents — immediately inform your bank to freeze or flag your account pending investigation.
- Do not confront the accused directly or negotiate informally without your advocate present — anything you say or agree to informally can complicate the case.
- Obtain a certified copy of the forged cheque from the bank at the earliest — this is the primary piece of evidence and you need it preserved officially.
Documents You Must Keep Ready
- Aadhaar card and PAN card (your identity proof)
- Original bank passbook or bank account statements showing the disputed debit
- Certified copy of the forged cheque from the bank
- Copy of the written complaint submitted to the bank manager and any acknowledgement received
- Any correspondence (emails, letters) between you and the bank or the accused
- Specimen signature card on record with the bank (request a certified copy)
- Proof of your residence abroad during the period of the fraud (visa, travel records, employment letters)
- Any prior communications that show you did not authorise any withdrawal during that period
What Evidence Is Required?
- The forged cheque itself — this is primary documentary evidence; certified copy from the bank is essential if the original is held by the bank
- Forensic handwriting expert report — comparing your genuine specimen signature with the forged signature on the cheque; this is the most critical evidence in forgery cases
- Bank's specimen signature records — to show the bank had a reference signature on file and failed to match it
- Bank account statements — showing the date and amount of the disputed withdrawal
- Your travel and immigration records — proving you were outside India and could not have personally signed or presented the cheque
- CCTV footage from the bank branch — if available, showing who actually presented and encashed the cheque (request preservation immediately — banks typically overwrite footage within 30-90 days)
- Witness testimony — your accountant or any person who can confirm when and how the fraud was discovered
How the Police Behave in Such Cases
Family fraud cases are sometimes treated by police as "civil disputes." Officers may initially suggest you resolve matters internally. This is wrong. Forgery of a negotiable instrument is a cognizable offence and registration of FIR is mandatory per Lalita Kumari v. Government of UP, 2014. Expect some initial reluctance — it's almost routine. Police may ask for bank verification before registering the FIR. Provide your chartered accountant's report, the certified cheque copy, and your travel records upfront. This pre-empts delay. Your advocate can accompany you and cite the relevant provisions, which typically speeds up the process considerably.
Timeline of Legal Process
- Week 1-2: File police complaint; send legal notice to bank; preserve CCTV footage and documents
- Week 2-4: FIR registration (or escalation to SP / Magistrate if police delay)
- Month 1-3: Police investigation — recording of statements, seizure of cheque, specimen signature comparison referred to Forensic Science Laboratory (FSL)
- Month 3-6: FSL handwriting expert report received; chargesheet filed before Magistrate
- Month 6-9: Magistrate takes cognizance; summons or warrant issued to accused
- Month 9-12: Framing of charges if accused contests
- Year 1-3: Trial — examination of witnesses, cross-examination, documentary evidence tendered
- Year 2-4: Final arguments and judgment
- Post-judgment: Appeal to Sessions Court or High Court if required
How Long Will
Advocate Sudhir Rao, Supreme Court of India