As required under the BCI Rules
The Bar Council of India does not permit advocates to solicit work or advertise. By clicking "I Agree", you acknowledge that:
• There has been no advertisement, solicitation, invitation, or inducement of any sort from Sudhir Rao or his chambers;
• You wish to gain more information about us for your own use;
• The information is provided only at your specific request;
• No material on this website constitutes legal advice or creates an attorney-client relationship.
Judgments of Courts when relevantPrevious judgments relevant to bar a second suit or trial.34. The existence of any judgment, order or decree which by law prevents any Court from taking cognizance of…
Legal review Reviewed for accuracy by Adv. Jyoti Rao how we review →
Judgments of Courts when relevant
Previous judgments relevant to bar a second suit or trial.
34. The existence of any judgment, order or decree which by law prevents any Court from taking cognizance of a suit or holding a trial, is a relevant fact when the question is whether such Court ought to take cognizance of such suit or to hold such trial.
About the author
Advocate practising before the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India, the Hon'ble Delhi High Court, and India's tribunals. 5+ years across constitutional, civil, criminal-appellate, and tribunal matters. Member · SCBA · DHCBA · DBA.
Related insights
Evidence as to application of language which can apply to one only of several persons.99. When the facts are such that the language used might have been meant to apply to any one, and could not have …
Read →Evidence as to document unmeaning in reference to existing facts.98. When language used in a document is plain in itself, but is unmeaning in reference to existing facts, evidence may be given to sho…
Read →Exclusion of evidence against application of document to existing facts.97. When language used in a document is plain in itself, and when it applies accurately to existing facts, evidence may not be …
Read →