Probate for Nominee: Can a Nominee Own a Flat?

One of my clients recently had a case which I am explaining below and if you are stuck in such similar situation, here is what to do.

Note: Due to attorney-client privilege, I cannot disclose complete case details or identify the actual parties involved. However, I am sharing the essential facts and legal approach so that if you find yourself in a similar situation, you can understand the available solutions and legal remedies.

TL;DR: Probate for nominee disputes usually ends in disappointment, because a nominee named on a society share certificate is not the owner of the flat. The flat belongs to the deceased owner's legal heirs, and until those heirs are identified and title is formally recorded, nobody can sell it. There is no probate in your situation because there is no will, so the correct route is letters of administration or a declaration of heirship, and a succession certificate will not do the job for immovable property.

The flat is on the third floor of a quiet co operative society. The member died. There was no will. In the society's file sat a nomination form, naming one person to receive the share certificate. That person took the keys, kept the maintenance paid, and understood the flat to be theirs. It is what most people in that position do. Then the heirs surfaced, and everything stopped. The society's manager would not transfer the shares, would not sign a no-objection, would not confirm anything in writing. The buyer who had been lined up lost interest and went elsewhere. That is the whole of the story as I have it. It is one side of it. The account is thin in places, the papers are still coming in, and there are things in the file I have not yet read.

Key facts about a nominee's claim over a society flat

• A nomination on a co-operative society's records is a direction to the society. It is not a will and it does not transfer ownership.
• The flat and the shares belong to the deceased member's estate, which passes to the legal heirs — not to whoever is nominated.
• A nominee can hold and manage the flat in the meantime, but that is a custodial position, not a title deed.
• Where there is no will, there is nothing to probate. The route is letters of administration, a declaration of heirship, or a civil suit.
• A succession certificate is limited to debts and securities. It will not let you transfer immovable property.
• No sale can complete, and no society will transfer shares, until the heirs are identified or a competent authority records their title.

A nominee is not an owner of the flat

When someone buys a flat in a co-operative housing society, they become a member and hold shares in the society. The flat itself is a bundle of rights held through that membership. Somewhere along the way, the member fills in a nomination form telling the society who it should deal with if they die.

The nomination is a housekeeping instruction. It answers the question "whom do we hand the share certificate to?" It does not answer the question "who owns the flat?" Those are different questions, and the confusion between them is the single most common reason these disputes end up in court.

What the society's bye-laws and state law actually say

Most state co-operative laws permit a member to nominate a person, and the registered bye-laws of the society usually carry a clause about it. On a plain reading, the clauses can look like they hand the property over. They do not, and courts have said so repeatedly.

What the Supreme Court has held

In Sarbati Devi v. Usha Devi (1984), the Supreme Court dealt with a nomination under a life insurance policy and held that the nominee is a mere custodian. The money passed to the nominee's hands for the benefit of the legal heirs, not as the nominee's own property.

Four decades later, in Shakti Yezdani v. Jayanagar Housing Society (2023), the Court applied the same reasoning to a co-operative housing society. A nomination over society shares does not make the nominee the absolute owner of the flat. The nomination is there for the society's convenience, and the nominee holds what comes to them on behalf of the legal heirs.

Some High Courts have taken slightly different positions on what exactly the nominee's role is during the gap — whether they are a trustee in the strict sense or simply a conduit. It does not change the practical outcome. Either way, the nominee cannot sell the flat as their own, and the society cannot treat the nomination as proof of title.

Do I need probate for nominee disputes when there is no will?

No. This is worth stating plainly, because it is where most people waste months. Probate is the process of proving a will. If the deceased left no will, there is no will to prove, and no court will grant probate of a document that does not exist.

What you have instead is intestate succession. The estate devolves on the heirs the personal law names, on the date of death. For a Hindu, that means the Class I heirs under the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. For a Muslim, it means the sharers under Muslim personal law. For a Christian or Parsi in many states, the Indian Succession Act, 1925 governs, and letters of administration is often the practical requirement before a society or a sub-registrar will act.

Letters of administration

Where a document from a court is needed, the petition is for letters of administration under the Indian Succession Act, 1925. The petition sets out who died, when, who the heirs are, and what the estate consists of. If the heirs agree among themselves, this is usually straightforward, though not fast. If one of them objects, it becomes a contested proceeding and the timeline stretches.

Legal heir certificate and declaration of heirship

Many states issue a legal heir certificate through the revenue authorities — the tehsildar or the collector's office, depending on where you are. It is quick and cheap, and banks and some societies accept it. Its weakness is that it is an administrative document. A society that has already been burnt once will often insist on something stronger.

Where the heirs cannot agree, or where the society is refusing, the answer is a civil suit for declaration of title and, if needed, partition. That is the slow route, and it is the one that actually settles the question. The society is usually impleaded as a party so that the transfer follows the decree.

Why a succession certificate will not work here

A succession certificate, granted under Part X of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, covers debts and securities. Fixed deposits, bank balances, shares in a company. It does not cover immovable property, and a flat in a co-operative society is immovable property for this purpose. People apply for one, get it, take it to the society, and are turned away. It is the wrong tool.

What the society will and will not do

The society's position is mostly defensive, and understandably so. It has a share certificate, a nomination form, a set of heirs it cannot verify, and a liability if it transfers to the wrong person.

In practice, societies do two things. If every legal heir signs a no-objection and an indemnity bond in the society's favour, and the society's managing committee passes a resolution, the shares are often transferred to the nominee or to the heirs jointly. That is the cheap route and it works when the family is cooperating.

If even one heir refuses to sign, the society will not move. It will keep accepting maintenance, keep the flat in the deceased member's name, and wait for a court order. No amount of correspondence will shift it.

Can the flat be sold before this is settled?

Not cleanly. A sale by the nominee alone is a sale by someone who may not own the flat. The buyer's lawyer will usually catch it at the title stage, and if the sale goes through anyway, the heirs can later challenge it. Financing a flat with a defective chain of title is close to impossible.

The practical exceptions are the ones above: all heirs on board, an indemnity, and a society willing to record the transfer. If any of those is missing, you are in a court process.

What to collect before you instruct anyone

• The death certificate.
• The society share certificate, if you have it. If the nominee holds it, ask the society in writing for a copy of the nomination on record.
• The registered sale deed or allotment letter for the flat.
• Property tax receipts and maintenance bills, which help establish who has been in possession and paying.
• A written application to the society asking for the reason for refusal, if it has refused. Society refusals are rarely in writing, and a written refusal is worth a great deal later.
• Names of all the legal heirs with proof of relationship — birth certificates, marriage records, the family register, whatever exists.
• Any correspondence with the nominee or with the other heirs. Even a WhatsApp thread is evidence.

On the criminal side: if a nomination form, a death certificate or a signature has been forged, that is a separate matter. Forgery, using a forged document and cheating sit in the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — Sections 336, 340 and 318 respectively — and a criminal breach of trust under Section 316 is arguable where the nominee was trusted with the flat and then treated it as their own. In practice the police close most of these as civil disputes on the first visit, and a well-drafted complaint that isolates the forgery, rather than the ownership quarrel, is what occasionally gets it registered. Proof of documents and any electronic trail is now governed by the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, which replaced the Evidence Act.

How long this takes

Honest answer: it depends entirely on whether the heirs are fighting. If they agree, and the society cooperates, transfer can be done in a few months. A legal heir certificate in most states takes weeks. Letters of administration, uncontested, runs into many months; contested, into years. A civil suit for declaration and partition in a city court is a long haul, and I would not tell anyone otherwise.

If you are in this position now

Send me the death certificate date, the date the society refused to act (or the date of the last reply, if there was one), and a two-line note on who is holding the keys and the original papers. That is enough for me to tell you which of the routes above fits.

You can write through the contact page, or book a consultation at /book. If you have already been served with a notice, mention the date in your first line. Deadlines matter, and a notice that looks routine sometimes is not.

Frequently Asked Questions