Family Dispute · 12 min read · 16 min 57 sec listen · Published 27 July 2026

Family Repeatedly Filing False Missing Complaints and Harassment at Workplace – Legal Remedies in India

A 27-year-old man in Jaipur faces repeated false missing complaints and workplace visits from family despite confirming he is safe. This article explains civil legal remedies, including injunctions an

Family Repeatedly Filing False Missing Complaints and Harassment at Workplace – Legal Remedies in India
One of my clients recently had a case which I am explaining below and if you are stuck in such similar situation, here is what to do.

Note: Due to attorney-client privilege, I cannot disclose complete case details or identify the actual parties involved. However, I am sharing the essential facts and legal approach so that if you find yourself in a similar situation, you can understand the available solutions and legal remedies.

TL;DR: Repeatedly filing false missing person complaints and showing up at an adult’s workplace after they’ve clearly stated they’re safe can be met with a firm civil injunction, a cease-and-desist legal notice, and in some cases a complaint for criminal intimidation. The law protects an adult’s right to live independently, and courts can order the family to stop this harassment.

Arjun Mehta, 27, works as a software engineer at Infosys in Jaipur. After years of what he describes as controlling and emotionally draining behaviour, he decided to go completely no contact with his family in Udaipur around early April 2024. That choice triggered a cascade of turmoil. His mother, sister Priya, brother Vikram, and their extended relatives began mobilising. First came the third‑party calls and messages, then a visit to his Jaipur office on 22 May 2024 — with police in tow. HR didn’t inform him, assuming it was a “family matter.” By 28 June 2024, the family turned up again, this time with a police officer from Udaipur, claiming the company was holding Arjun “hostage.” The entire episode played out in front of colleagues, deeply embarrassing him. Despite repeated written confirmations to HR, texts to the police that he was safe, and a signed undertaking, the harassment continued. His earlier attempts — speaking informally to local authorities on his own — had failed to stop the cycle. Frustrated, Arjun approached the Chamber of Advocate Sudhir Rao. The office of Advocate Sudhir Rao, with deep experience in civil protection matters, swiftly identified the right legal strategy. Advocate Sudhir Rao crafted a robust cease‑and‑desist notice and then a petition for permanent injunction — and the court’s order finally put an end to the family’s ability to use the police and employer as instruments of pressure.

Key Facts of the Case

  • Arjun is a 27‑year‑old adult living independently in Jaipur, with no legal guardian.
  • He voluntarily cut off contact with his family in Udaipur, citing long‑standing personal trauma.
  • His family repeatedly filed missing person complaints with the Udaipur police, despite his clear communications that he was safe.
  • The family visited his Infosys workplace on two separate occasions (May and June 2024), bringing police officers to verify his well‑being.
  • Arjun had already provided written confirmation to HR, signed an undertaking, and sent a text message to the police officer — yet the complaints persisted.
  • During the second visit, the family focused not on his safety but on pressuring him to resume contact, and his brother became verbally abusive at the workplace.
  • The police officer acknowledged that his only duty was to verify Arjun was alive and safe, but the family weaponised this verification process.
Can I get a court order to stop my family from approaching my workplace or filing complaints?

Yes. A civil suit for permanent injunction can be filed under Section 38 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, read with Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The court can restrain the family from interfering with your personal liberty, entering your workplace, or filing false police complaints. Because the harm is ongoing, you can also seek an interim injunction while the suit is pending — this can be granted within days if the urgency is demonstrated.

Is a legal notice enough, or must I go to court?

A lawyer‑drafted cease‑and‑desist notice often works. It puts the family on formal notice that their actions are unlawful and that you will pursue legal remedies if they don’t stop. Many matters settle after a stern notice. If they ignore it, you proceed with a civil suit. In Arjun’s case, the combination of a detailed legal notice and a swiftly filed injunction petition gave the family no room to continue.

Can the police stop them from filing repeated missing complaints?

Technically, the police can note your statement that you’re not missing and close the file. However, if the family keeps approaching different stations, you can request the local police to record a “no‑missing” declaration and circulate it. If the harassment is egregious, you could file a complaint under Section 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (criminal intimidation), but that’s a criminal route and often escalates matters.

Advice in Such Cases

Consult with Lawyer: The very basic and important step to start is talk to Lawyer / advocate. You should not hesitate in paying his consultation fee i.e. might be in range of Rs. 10,000 to 50,000 depends case to case. He is helping you in this situation to come out. He is expert in the domain and can help you explain the procedure which you might have never explored. A good lawyer can get the issues resolved much faster than you think.

Do not delay. Every time they show up at your workplace, your professional reputation suffers. Write to your HR formally, stating that you are not missing and that any visits are unwelcome — this creates a paper trail. And here’s the thing: do not engage with the family directly once you’ve decided to go no contact; any communication can be twisted and used against you. This category of case — protecting an adult’s right to live without harassment — involves nuanced pleadings and a sensitive approach to interim reliefs. An advocate who regularly handles civil protection matters will know exactly how to frame the prayers and handle the police’s role.

Applicable Sections of Law

The following provisions underpin a civil action to restrain family harassment:

  • Section 38, Specific Relief Act, 1963 — permanent injunction to prevent a person from doing an act that interferes with the plaintiff’s legal rights.
  • Order 39 Rules 1 and 2, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — temporary injunction and interim orders to maintain status quo or prevent injury pending the suit.
  • Article 21, Constitution of India — right to life and personal liberty, which encompasses the right to live independently and make personal choices.
  • Section 351(2), Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — criminal intimidation, if the harassment includes threats or causes alarm, though this is a criminal provision and should be used cautiously.

Jurisdiction — Where to File the Case

A civil suit for injunction can be filed in the district court or the court of the senior civil judge having jurisdiction over the place where the harassment occurs or where the plaintiff resides. For Arjun, that was Jaipur. If the family lives in Udaipur, you can also sue them where they reside, as the cause of action partly arose there when they filed complaints. Territorial jurisdiction matters — filing in a court far from either party can lead to delays. So choose the court where you work or live; it’s more convenient and the local police are easier to coordinate with.

Limitation Period

For a suit seeking a perpetual injunction, the Limitation Act, 1963, applies. The limitation is three years from the date the right to sue accrues — that is, from each act of harassment. Since the harassment is recurring, a fresh cause of action arises every time they visit or file a complaint. So the clock resets with each incident. Don’t wait; if you let months pass, the urgency argument weakens. The court can condone delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act if you have good reasons, but it’s not something you should rely on.

Interim Reliefs Available

This is where civil protection cases often succeed. You can move an application for temporary injunction under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC. If the court is satisfied that there’s a prima facie case, that the balance of convenience lies in your favour, and that you’ll suffer irreparable injury without the injunction, it can pass an ad‑interim order immediately — sometimes even without hearing the other side. In Arjun’s case, the interim order restrained the family from entering his workplace premises, contacting his employer, or filing any further police complaints claiming he was missing. That gave immediate relief while the suit was pending. Make no mistake, a well‑drafted interim application can end the harassment within a week.

If You Are the Victim

  • Send a formal legal notice through your advocate — this alone often stops the behaviour.
  • Inform your employer’s HR and security in writing, with a copy of your undertaking, that you are not missing and that these visits are unwanted.
  • File a complaint with the local police station where you reside, stating that you are not missing and that false complaints are being made; ask them to record a “non‑missing” declaration.
  • If they still don’t stop, swiftly file a civil suit for injunction with an interim application.
  • Maintain a diary of every call, message, visit, and police interaction — dates, names, what was said.

Documents You Must Keep Ready

  • Aadhaar card, PAN card, or passport — proof of identity and age.
  • Proof of residence in the city (rent agreement, utility bill).
  • Copy of all written communications to HR and the police, including the undertaking you signed.
  • Screenshot or record of the text message you sent to the police officer confirming you’re safe.
  • Photographs or videos of the family at your workplace, if you can safely capture them.
  • Any call logs or messages from third parties trying to pressure you on the family’s behalf.
  • Employment ID card and a letter from HR confirming the incidents, if they’ll provide one.
  • Notarised affidavit stating your decision to live independently and the reasons for going no contact (optional but helpful).

What Evidence Is Required?

  • Primary evidence: your written statement to HR and the police, the signed undertaking, and any official police record of the verification.
  • Secondary evidence: emails from HR acknowledging the family’s visits, call recordings (with caution — the admissibility of recordings made without consent can vary, but they can be persuasive in civil matters).
  • Witness testimony: colleagues or security personnel who saw the family at your workplace can testify.
  • CCTV footage from your office building — request preservation of footage from the dates of the visits.
  • Police diary entries or a copy of the missing complaint closure report.
  • Your contemporaneous notes detailing each event — date, time, who was present, what was said.

How Courts Typically Approach Such Cases

Indian courts respect an adult’s right to autonomy and personal liberty. When a plaintiff demonstrates a clear, settled decision to live independently and shows evidence of repeated interference, the court is inclined to grant protection. Judges are particularly mindful of workplace harassment — it affects livelihood and dignity. So expect a relatively swift hearing on the interim application once the urgency is shown. The family may argue emotional distress or parental rights, but those don’t override an adult’s fundamental right to be left alone. The court will balance the family’s concerns against your right to privacy, and when you’ve already clarified you’re safe, the scales tip heavily in your favour.

  • Legal notice: drafted and sent within a day or two; response typically expected in 7‑15 days.
  • Filing of suit and interim application: plaint prepared, court fees paid, suit registered — can be done in 2‑3 days.
  • Interim hearing: within a week to ten days; if urgency is demonstrated, ad‑interim order passed the same day or next.
  • Written statement by defendants: within 30 days, extendable to 90 days.
  • Issues framed and trial: evidence on affidavits, cross‑examination; this stage can take 6‑12 months depending on court backlog.
  • Final judgment: typically 12‑18 months from filing if contested.
  • Execution: if the decree is disobeyed, you can file execution proceedings to enforce the injunction, which can be punished by contempt of court.

Understanding the Costs

The total cost of a matter like this varies significantly from one case to the next — it depends on the complexity of the dispute, the forum involved, the number of hearings, and the specific facts of your situation. There is no single fixed figure that applies to everyone.

A professional advocate can give you an accurate estimate only after reviewing all your facts and documents in a consultation.

Can the Matter Be Settled Out of Court?

Yes, often. A well‑drafted legal notice might lead to an undertaking by the family that they won’t approach your workplace or file further complaints. Mediation is also an option — under Section 89 CPC, the court can refer the parties to mediation. If the family genuinely wants to de‑escalate, a mediated settlement can include a written agreement guaranteeing your space. But if the harassment has been persistent and manipulative, don’t expect a mediated resolution to be honoured without a court’s backing. In Arjun’s case, the combination of a strong notice and the immediate filing of the suit left the family with no choice but to stop.

Common Mistakes People Make

  • Delay in acting — hoping the family will “give up” on their own. This only emboldens them.
  • Not informing HR and security formally; a verbal chat isn’t enough. A written trail is what protects you and the company from liability.
  • Engaging in emotional arguments with the family when they show up. Any conversation can be misrepresented later.
  • Failing to preserve evidence — deleting messages, not noting dates, assuming the incident will be a one‑off.
  • Approaching a general practitioner who doesn’t regularly handle civil protection matters. The drafting of an injunction petition in a harassment‑by‑family context requires a nuanced understanding of personal liberty arguments that a specialist is far more likely to get right — and quickly.
  • Posting about the family conflict on social media while legal proceedings are ongoing — this can weaken your position and give the other side material to use.

FAQs People Normally Have

Can my family file a missing person complaint if they genuinely don’t know where I am?
They can, but once the police verify you’re safe and you’ve stated you don’t want contact, the complaint should be closed. Repeatedly filing after that can be seen as an abuse of process.

Is going “no contact” with family illegal in India?
No. An adult has every right to choose not to communicate with family. There’s no legal obligation to stay in touch.

Can my employer forbid my family from entering the premises?
Absolutely. Companies can enforce trespass policies. With a court injunction in hand, the employer is even more protected in barring entry.

What if the police don’t take my statement seriously?
Approach the senior inspector or the Superintendent of Police. If that fails, a lawyer can file a formal representation, and a court can direct the police to record your declaration.

Will an injunction affect my family’s right to file a genuine police complaint in the future?
An injunction narrowly tailored to prevent false missing complaints won’t bar them from filing a legitimate complaint about a real crime. It just stops the specific harassment.

This article is general legal information, not legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate about your specific situation.

Advocate Sudhir Rao, Supreme Court of India

Was this article useful?

/5 (0 ratings)