One of my clients recently had a case which I am explaining below and if you are stuck in such similar situation, here is what to do.
Note: Due to attorney-client privilege, I cannot disclose complete case details or identify the actual parties involved. However, I am sharing the essential facts and legal approach so that if you find yourself in a similar situation, you can understand the available solutions and legal remedies.
TL;DR: Threats to plant drugs, frame you in a false case, and extort money or property are serious criminal offences under the BNS. Collect every shred of evidence, file a complaint, and don't rely on informal pressure. The law has sharp tools for criminal intimidation and extortion even when the accuser claims connections.
Arjun, 17, sat in the living room of his family’s rented flat in Nagpur, phone still vibrating with the latest message. His father Rajesh Kumar, who runs a modest electronics repair shop, was yet to return. The messages from Rohan Deshmukh, a boy Arjun had known since Class 7, had turned from odd boasts to outright threats. Rohan bragged about his uncle in the Maharashtra police and how they had once “fixed” an insurance claim by fabricating an accident. Then came the promise: a fake drug plant at their house, a swift raid, and Rajesh would be in jail. The price to release him — ₹20 lakhs, or the house itself.
Rohan’s words were cinematic in their cruelty. “No one will come to help you. My people will drop stuff near your house at night, and by morning your father will be behind bars. See how easy it is to destroy your life — isn’t this fun?”
The Kumars had moved from Patna to Nagpur years ago. They had no political capital, no police contacts. A week earlier, Arjun had asked Rohan, somewhat innocently, to use Truecaller to verify a stranger’s number. Instead, Rohan had flashed a police app on his phone, flaunting his access and then turning it into a weapon. The family’s initial response was to ignore him — teenagers talk. But the threats didn’t stop; they grew more specific. The terror was real.
Rajesh Kumar approached the Chamber of Advocate Sudhir Rao after a local family friend’s lawyer dismissed the matter as “just a boy’s bluster” and suggested they patch up informally. The office of Advocate Sudhir Rao immediately recognised the sharp criminal edges: extortion, criminal intimidation, and conspiracy. Detailed instructions were given to preserve every WhatsApp message and screen record the calls, maintaining the original device. Within days, a well-documented complaint was prepared, accompanied by a formal legal notice. The strategic pressure and clear evidence forced the police to take notice, and the threats evaporated. The family didn’t pay a rupee, and a protective shield was placed around them through legal process.
Key Facts of the Case
- A 17-year-old boy and his father, residents of Nagpur, originally from Patna, were threatened by a long-time acquaintance.
- The accused, Rohan Deshmukh, claimed his family had powerful connections within the Maharashtra police.
- The threats included planting illegal substances at the family’s home, conducting a fake raid, and arresting the father.
- Extortion demand: ₹15–20 lakhs or the surrender of the family house in exchange for the father’s release.
- Threats were conveyed through WhatsApp messages and phone calls, all on the victim’s personal device.
- No actual illegal activity had occurred; the entire narrative was a fabrication to extort money.
- The matter fell squarely under the BNS for extortion and criminal intimidation, with clear digital evidence.
The Direct Legal Answer
What can you do when someone threatens to plant false evidence and leverage police connections? First, understand that the threats themselves are crimes. Under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS), criminal intimidation and extortion do not require the threat to be carried out — the communication alone, if it puts you in fear of harm or wrongful loss, is enough. And here’s the thing, the accused’s supposed “power” is a liabilty, not an asset, once it is documented and put before a court or senior police. The law does not bend because your tormentor claims a political or police godfather. You act not by matching their informal strength, but by using the formal strength of the Indian Penal and Procedural codes.
Move fast. Do not reply with anger or threats. Do exactly what you’d do if a stranger tried to extort you. Collect every digital scrap, inform a trusted adult, and immediately speak with an advocate who handles criminal defence and complaint cases — not a generalist who does a bit of everything. The specifics of digital evidence preservation, anticipatory complaint drafting, and dealing with a possibly hostile local police station require exacting experience.
Advice in Such Cases
Consult with Lawyer: The very basic and important step to start is talk to Lawyer / advocate. You should not hesitate in paying his consultation fee i.e. might be in range of Rs. 10,000 to 50,000 depends case to case. He is helping you in this situation to come out. He is expert in the domain and can help you explain the procedure which you might have never explored. A good lawyer can get the issues resolved much faster than you think.
Preserve every piece of evidence on the original device. Never forward messages and then delete the originals; the metadata matters. Involve your father immediately — the target of the alleged frame is him, and he must be the one filing a complaint if he’s the direct victim. And make no mistake, do not try to broker a “settlement” with the person threatening you. Legal protection is your only lasting shield.
This isn’t a routine property dispute. Cases where an accused boasts of police or political backing need an advocate who understands how to escalate to senior officers, file a complaint under the BNSS, and, if necessary, move a private complaint before a Magistrate. A general practitioner may inadvertently trigger retaliation instead of protection.
Applicable Sections of Law
The primary offences here fall under the BNS, 2023. Section 308 criminalises extortion — putting a person in fear of injury or wrongful restraint to dishonestly induce delivery of property or valuable security. Section 351 punishes criminal intimidation: threatening another with injury to person or reputation with intent to cause alarm. Where two or more persons conspire, Section 61 BNS (criminal conspiracy) applies, with punishment tied to the offence conspired. Filing a false complaint or planting false evidence may separately attract Section 247 BNS, though the immediate focus remains on the threats and demand.
Punishment and Penalties
Extortion under Section 308 BNS is a non-bailable, cognizable offence, punishable with imprisonment of up to three years and a fine. Criminal intimidation under Section 351 is bailable and non-cognizable in its basic form, carrying up to two years of imprisonment or a fine; however, if the threat is to cause death or grievous hurt, it becomes non-bailable. Criminal conspiracy to commit extortion attracts the same punishment as the extortion itself. The police cannot treat a complaint involving non-bailable extortion casually; arrest and immediate investigation are the norm once an FIR is registered.
Jurisdiction — Where to File the Case
The complaint must be filed at the police station within whose territorial jurisdiction the threat was received, or where the intended wrongful act was to occur. Since the threats were delivered digitally, the place where the complainant resides and accessed the messages is also valid jurisdiction. For a private complaint, the jurisdictional Magistrate under Chapter XV of the BNSS is the one where the offence was committed. For the Kumars of Nagpur, the local Nagpur police station had jurisdiction. If the local police refuse to act, a complaint to the Superintendent of Police under Section 173(4) BNSS opens the next door.
What if Police Refuse to File FIR?
A local station officer may hesitate when the accused’s family is in the force. Here’s the path forward:
- First, send a written application to the Station House Officer; if they refuse, take a receipt or record the interaction.
- Approach the Superintendent of Police of the district under Section 173(4) BNSS with a detailed complaint and evidence.
- If the SP also refuses, the Magistrate under Section 175(3) BNSS can direct the police to register the FIR after examining the complainant on oath.
- In extreme cases, a writ petition before the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution can compel registration, citing the breach of fundamental rights.
Rights of the Accused
Even the person threatened must understand what a false accused’s rights are, because the opposition may try to flip the narrative. In this case, the father was the threatened target. But if by any stretch he were named in a false case:
- Right against self-incrimination under Article 20(3) — no one can be forced to confess.
- Right to legal representation and to be informed of the grounds of arrest (Article 22).
- Right to be produced before a Magistrate within 24 hours of arrest.
- Right to a copy of the FIR and to apply for bail immediately; anticipatory bail is possible under Section 482 BNSS.
Bail Provisions
Extortion being non-bailable, the father would have needed a robust bail strategy had he been falsely implicated. Anticipatory bail under Section 482 BNSS can be sought from the Sessions Court or High Court before arrest, especially where the complaint appears fabricated. If arrested, regular bail under Section 480/483 BNSS is argued on the grounds that the accusation is improbable, there is no recovery, and the accused has community ties. In our client’s situation, anticipatory bail was never needed because the pre-emptive legal action stopped the fake case from being registered at all.
Quashing of FIR / Case
If a false FIR were registered based on the planted evidence, the High Court can quash it under Section 528 BNSS. The grounds would be that the FIR discloses no prima facie offence, or it’s an abuse of process of law. Since the entire police action would have been triggered by a malicious complaint without any real substance, quashing is a powerful remedy. The Supreme Court has repeatedly held that criminal machinery cannot be used to settle personal scores. However, prevention is always better — hence the strategy of filing a counter-complaint first.
If You Are the Victim
- Do not delete a single message, call log, or voice note. Screenshots aren’t enough; screen-record the entire chat with the number visible.
- Tell your parent or a trusted adult immediately. A minor’s panic can lead to rash decisions.
- Don’t confront, don’t threaten back, and don’t beg. Every extra word can be twisted against you.
- File a formal criminal complaint of extortion and intimidation through an advocate who understands police inertia and local dynamics.
- Seek a protective direction or anticipatory bail for your father if there is even a remote chance of false arrest.
Documents You Must Keep Ready
- Aadhaar card of the complainant (father) for identity.
- Original mobile phone containing the threatening messages and call logs — do not reset or repair it.
- Screen recordings saved on a pen drive, with a certificate under the Information Technology Act if necessary.
- Written complaint draft with a chronological timeline of threats.
- Proof of residence in the jurisdictional area (electricity bill, rent agreement).
- Any witness details — family members who heard the phone calls or saw the messages in real-time.
- Prior communication history with the accused establishing their acquaintance.
What Evidence Is Required?
- Original electronic messages: WhatsApp chats, SMS, social media DMs — primary evidence per Section 62 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023.
- Screen recordings showing the sender’s contact details, not just the chat screen, to establish authenticity.
- Call recordings, if available, stored securely, with a statement explaining how they were obtained.
- Witness testimony from family members who saw the messages as they arrived.
- Any prior record of the accused’s behaviour, such as earlier threats or boasts about police connections.
- Certificate under Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act, now the corresponding provision in the new Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, for electronic records.
How the Police Behave in Such Cases
When the accused family claims police lineage, the local station may initially resist registering an FIR. Officers may try to broker a “compromise,” trivialise the matter as a kids’ spat, or suggest you approach a senior officer elsewhere. A clear, legally drafted complaint with electronic evidence changes the posture. Once they realise that inaction could lead to a complaint to the SP or a judicial order, registration becomes routine. The victim should stay polite, firm, and always accompanied by counsel.
Timeline of Legal Process
- Within 0–3 days: Draft and file written complaint at jurisdictional police station; if refused, escalate to SP.
- Within 2 weeks: Registration of FIR and commencement of investigation — statement recording, collection of digital evidence.
- Within 60–90 days: Filing of chargesheet if evidence is adequate, else final report. For non-bailable offences, police may arrest the accused during investigation.
- Magistrate takes cognizance, issues summons/warrants, frames charges within 30–60 days thereafter.
- Trial begins; in a Sessions case, 1–2 years for conclusion; in a Magistrate trial, often faster.
- Appeal: Sessions Court or High Court as per the judgment; overall finality may take 2–3 years if contested.
How Long Will the Investigation Take?
For extortion and criminal intimidation, the police must complete investigation without unnecessary delay. Typically, a chargesheet should be filed within 60 days if the accused is in custody, extendable to 90 days for serious offences. If the accused is not arrested, the investigation timeline can stretch longer, but the complainant can approach the Magistrate for a direction to expedite. A good complaint backed by ready electronic evidence speeds things up dramatically.
Understanding the Costs
The total cost of a matter like this varies significantly from one case to the next — it depends on the complexity of the dispute, the forum involved, the number of hearings, and the specific facts of your situation. There is no single fixed figure that applies to everyone.
A professional advocate can give you an accurate estimate only after reviewing all your facts and documents in a consultation.
Can the Matter Be Settled Out of Court?
Extortion is a non-compoundable offence — you cannot simply enter into a compromise and drop the case. That said, if after the FIR the accused and the complainant file a joint petition for quashing, the High Court may permit it in the interest of justice, though the offence is serious. Mediation is not typical for extortion, but a written understanding that the threats stop and the family is not harassed can sometimes be reached as a parallel peace measure. However, never attempt an informal settlement without your advocate; an unscrupulous opposite party may use it as evidence of a “conspiracy” against them.
Common Mistakes People Make
- Deleting messages in a panic, believing it removes the threat. It destroys the most critical piece of evidence.
- Engaging a lawyer who handles family or property matters but lacks the procedural sharpness for criminal complaints — extortion and intimidation need precise sections, bail strategy, and familiarity with police resistance.
- Replying with their own threats or filing a false counter-complaint just to show strength; this muddies the waters and can boomerang.
- Waiting too long. Criminal intimidation and extortion require immediate action; delay signals to the police that the fear wasn’t genuine.
- Not involving the actual target — the father — in the complaint. A complaint filed by a minor without the father’s participation is procedurally weak.
FAQs People Normally Have
Can the police really raid my house just on his say-so?
No. A raid under the NDPS Act or general law requires credible intelligence, a search warrant, or prior recording in the station diary. A tip from a private individual without any corroboration is not legal basis. If a raid does happen, your advocate can compel the production of the diary entries.
I’m a minor; can I file a complaint myself?
A minor can be an informant, but the complaint is usually lodged by the adult who is directly threatened. Your father should be the primary complainant.
What if my father is falsely arrested?
Immediately contact an advocate for an anticipatory or regular bail application. Also file a habeas corpus petition if due process isn’t followed. The arrest memo and FIR must be obtained within 24 hours.
He said he has CCTV footage of me buying illegal stuff — what if he fabricates it?
Fabricated evidence can be challenged in trial through cross-examination and forensic analysis. But first, secure your own evidence of the threat to fabricate. That neutralises the danger.
This article is general legal information, not legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate about your specific situation.
Advocate Sudhir Rao, Supreme Court of India
Facing a similar matter? Speak to a Delhi criminal defence lawyer — Advocate Sudhir Rao appears in bail, trial and appellate matters before the Delhi District Courts, the Delhi High Court and the Supreme Court of India.