One of my clients recently had a case which I am explaining I can't complete this one — the thread you've given me has no subject matter left in it. What I have is a single stub line: > "One of my clients recently had a case which I am explaining" Nothing after it. That line identifies no legal problem, no forum question, no facts, no jurisdiction-specific issue, and no focus keyword. Everything the house style requires me to do — open in the middle of the story, keep one mundane detail from the post, answer the actual question early, place the keyword in the title/slug/H1/first 100 words/one H2/an alt text — depends on material that isn't here. Writing anyway would mean inventing the whole thing: the offence, the notice, the dates, the sections involved. Rule 14 forbids exactly that, and it outranks the instruction to "complete every remaining section." A fabricated cheque-bounce article when the original post was about a matrimonial notice is worse than no article. Two other problems with the stub as it stands, worth flagging before you send the rest: - **It breaks confidentiality framing.** "One of my clients recently had a case" puts a real client's matter on a public page. The house style already solves this — write from a *posted forum question*, anonymised, not from a client file. The opening line needs to go entirely, not be continued from. - **No focus keyword was supplied.** I can't place it in the title, slug, H1, first 100 words, an H2 and an alt text if I don't know what it is. I also can't count the title to 60 characters without knowing the phrase. **What I need to write it properly:** 1. The forum post or question — the actual text, or a paraphrase with the facts intact (what happened, what was served/said, any dates or deadlines mentioned, what the person wants to know). 2. The focus keyword. 3. Confirmation of the practice area, so I match the right counsel — Sudhir Rao (criminal defence, cyber crime, economic offences) or Adv. Jyoti Rao (family and matrimonial). Send those and I'll write the full piece from the top: title, slug, TL;DR, story layer, analysis, key facts, FAQ, disclaimer, and the closing contact paragraph pointing to /contact-us or /book. I can't finish this one either — there is nothing to continue. What you sent as "the article so far" isn't an article. It's a note saying the source material was missing. The last line of it asks for the forum post, the focus keyword, and the practice area. Those still haven't arrived. So "continue from where it stopped" means continue a request for inputs, and there are no remaining sections to write because none were ever started — no title, no slug, no TL;DR, no story, no analysis, no key facts, no FAQ. The instruction to complete every remaining section can't override the rule that outranks it. To produce H2s, key facts, an FAQ and a closing contact paragraph, I'd have to invent a legal problem — the offence, the notice, the dates, the person, the forum. That would be a fabricated article attached to a real advocate's name. I won't do that, and the tag line asking me to close with his name is exactly why I won't. I'm also not going to append a disclaimer and a sign-off to an empty page to make it look finished. A page with a disclaimer and nothing above it is worse than no page. To actually get the piece, send three things: 1. The forum post or the question, in substance — what happened, what was served or said, any dates or deadlines in it, and what the person wants to know. 2. The focus keyword, exactly as it should appear. 3. The practice area — Sudhir Rao (criminal defence, cyber crime, economic offences) or Adv. Jyoti Rao (family and matrimonial). With those, the article writes itself from the top in one pass: title under 60 characters, slug, TL;DR, the story opened mid-scene using only details from the post, the analysis in sequence, a keyword H2, key facts, FAQ, disclaimer, and a close telling the reader what to send to /contact-us. Send the post and I'll write it.
Facing a similar matter? Speak to a criminal advocate in Delhi — Advocate Sudhir Rao appears in bail, trial and appellate matters before the Delhi District Courts, the Delhi High Court and the Supreme Court of India.